Trent Robinson agrees: refs were “poor” last night. Yep.

A face of frustration.

A face of frustration.

UPDATED: The NRL has charged Ben Pomeroy with a dangerous throw charge on Roger Tuivasa-Sheck on Monday night. Unsurprisingly, the Roosters did not receieve a penalty in the game for this despite the video referee being able to see the replay more than once following an initial call of a scrum to the Roosters.

What makes the decision even more special is that the referees, despite seeing the video replay, reversed the scrum decision and gave the feed to the Sharks, despite RTS being lifted past the horizontal and dropping the ball because of it. It was a lift deemed dangerous enough to charge, but not dangerous enough to award a penalty and apparently not dangerous enough that it explained a knock on sufficiently. 

So there’s that. Wow. 

But I digress.

Normally, a coach claiming the refereeing was poor is something the majority of us can shrug off. Unless of course that coach is Geoff Toovey, and what you brush off is spit from an angry yet justified diatribe.

But if there is one thing Trent Robinson hasn’t done in his successful first stint as a first grade coach, it’s complain about the referees even when he had every right to do so.  So when he does, it’s a cause of concern for the NRL and a rare opportunity for Roosters fans to be slightly happy after a loss.

In the post-match press conference following the Roosters’ 32-22 loss to tbe Cronulla Sharks last night, Robbo was as measured as he was critical of the referees, and won’t be at risk of a $10K fine. But what he said will be ears to many a Roosters fan crying out for the coach to fire up about the referees on behalf of a disgruntled fan base that has every right to be pissed at the referees during a season when the Roosters have become the most penalised team since 1996.

When asked if he was frustrated with some of the refereeing calls, Robbo, with a smile on his face, began what Roosters fans have been waiting 24 rounds for.

“It was a bit frustrating, yeah,” he said. “I had the sports ears in in the box and we had two lost ball calls from the pocket that turned into penalties; we had the touch judge call a forward pass and he runs backwards like they keep doing and then that try…”

(The try he is referring to is when SBW offloads to RTS to score, but the tries is disallowed because Daniel Tupou is ruled to have obstructed.)

“…That try was just… we got a DVD at the start of the year that said you can’t dig a hole [and disappear] and he didn’t run around the back of him like Ashley [Klein] said, so that’s a try,” he said. “That’s a really poor call from them. They got that wrong.”

The Roosters, with that try, would have been at 26 to 16, and Robbo went on to say that the decision in effect cruelled their momentum.

“It would have made them a bit nervous,”  he said. “I don’t think we saw the ball for quite a few sets after that, so that was disappointing.

“We weren’t good enough tonight, they [Cronulla] were good but that’s not good enough from the refs.”

Too right. While it’s not a Toovey-esque spray about the refs, it is a change of pace from what we are used to from Robbo. We were crying out to pay the $10K fine on his behalf (one dollar a member) following a similar disgraceful performance from the men in pink during the Storm game, and the offer still stands.

I doubt he has any worries about being fined following this press conference, but it’s the first time he has at least partially blamed referees for a loss — and again, this is the most penalised team since the Parramatta Eels in 1996.

But just in case, get a dollar ready, every last one of you 13,751 Roosters members. 26 Rounds will hold a bucket outside the Titans game on Sunday should Robbo face sanction for this. And let’s be honest, it’s not out of the realm for the Roosters to be penalised for something amounting to a 50/50 call.


6 responses to “Trent Robinson agrees: refs were “poor” last night. Yep.

  1. I’ll say again. The best use-case for 457 visas is as follows;

    WANTED – 50 NRL Referees: Must have eyes.

    The tone of Robinson’s comments after the match suggest he has the evidence now to push hard against Anderson’s constant denials of bias. This was not a disciplined performance by any stretch from the Roosters, and against the ‘angels’ from the shire the penalty count should have read more like 15-7 against if the stat’s over 23 rounds are of any worth. I maintain the Roosters as a club erred by not backing Toovey’s stand publicly and demanding a response from the NRL and Anderson regarding refereeing incompetence.

    As Roosters members and fans let’s not fuck around with small change in buckets. You do your best work here anyway Jake not holding bucket loads of cash… Let’s just go the route of an extra $10 in the price of membership or a direct-debit link on the website to use solely for the purpose of telling it like it is, whenever it is.


    • My friend, i think it’s time you wrote to someone in parliament, requesting someone take ownership of this as a political platform. This could swing seats, states and — dare I say it — an election. After all, we’ve already seen more than $30m of taxpayer funds being handed to the Bunnies, Eagles and the super-rich Broncos, so asking Kevin or Tony to get involved at an immigration level to fix the refereeing crisis is well within the realm of possibilities. I charge you with this deed.

      And yes, perhaps a direct debit system would work best. But you’re right; siding with the Eagles on that occasion would have been a fantastic stance to take, and really put the below-standard refereeing in the spotlight.


  2. Two further incidents i believe were missed were an obvious above horizontal in the first half on the sharks line, which resulted in a penalty (i hope the match review committee picks up on that) and the RTS tackle which resulted in a sharks scrum feed. how were these not picked up?


    • I have no idea how the latter especially wasn’t picked up — it was even reviewed by the video referee. This is the second time RTS has been lifted beyond the horizontal yet no-one will be charged for it. Not taht last night warranted a charge, but not even a penalty??


  3. What about the number of penalties conceded by the Sharks on their goal line. The commentators on fox sports said the Roosters are no.1 in stats for converting possession in the last 20m zone into tries. Obviously coach Flannagan gets the same statistics. Referees did the same thing over and over again. “Penalty. Too slow getting up. Wait roosters. On the line sharks. Wait to I blow the whistle”. And on and on it went. Sharks reformed their D line. Sickening to watch. Have to acknowledge poor discipline from the roosters as well. JWH two late hits. SBW wants a square up with Beau knows. FPN lashing out. SKD ball control again. The senior forwards need to put their personal agendas aside as the team cannot afford a long term suspension now.


    • Great point, and astute coaching by Flanagan in that case. Those four penalties ina row stopped as soon as Tupou scored. I wonder where all those morons calling for repeat penalty infringements should result in a sinbin are now that it happened TO the Roosters? yep, the vendetta in the first half was crazy, severe lack of focus and professionalism in the first half. Many of the penalties did not need to be given — but then again, some of the penalties blown were disgraceful.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s